kernel expansion
KHRONOS: a Kernel-Based Neural Architecture for Rapid, Resource-Efficient Scientific Computation
Contemporary models of high dimensional physical systems are constrained by the curse of dimensionality and a reliance on dense data. We introduce KHRONOS (Kernel Expansion Hierarchy for Reduced Order, Neural Optimized Surrogates), an AI framework for model based, model free and model inversion tasks. KHRONOS constructs continuously differentiable target fields with a hierarchical composition of per-dimension kernel expansions, which are tensorized into modes and then superposed. We evaluate KHRONOS on a canonical 2D, Poisson equation benchmark: across 16 to 512 degrees of freedom (DoFs), it obtained L_2-square errors of 5e-4 down to 6e-11. This represents a greater than 100-fold gain over Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (which itself reports a 100 times improvement on MLPs/PINNs with 100 times fewer parameters) when controlling for the number of parameters. This also represents a 1e6-fold improvement in L_2-square error compared to standard linear FEM at comparable DoFs. Inference complexity is dominated by inner products, yielding sub-millisecond full-field predictions that scale to an arbitrary resolution. For inverse problems, KHRONOS facilitates rapid, iterative level set recovery in only a few forward evaluations, with sub-microsecond per sample latency. KHRONOS's scalability, expressivity, and interpretability open new avenues in constrained edge computing, online control, computer vision, and beyond.
Gaussian kernel expansion with basis functions uniformly bounded in $\mathcal{L}_{\infty}$
Bisiacco, Mauro, Pillonetto, Gianluigi
Kernel expansions are a topic of considerable interest in machine learning, also because of their relation to the so-called feature maps introduced in machine learning. Properties of the associated basis functions and weights (corresponding to eigenfunctions and eigenvalues in the Mercer setting) give insight into for example the structure of the associated reproducing kernel Hilbert space, the goodness of approximation schemes, the convergence rates and generalization properties of kernel machines. Recent work in the literature has derived some of these results by assuming uniformly bounded basis functions in $\mathcal{L}_\infty$. Motivated by this line of research, we investigate under this constraint all possible kernel expansions of the Gaussian kernel, one of the most widely used models in machine learning. Our main result is the construction on $\mathbb{R}^2$ of a Gaussian kernel expansion with weights in $\ell_p$ for any $p>1$. This result is optimal since we also prove that $p=1$ cannot be reached by the Gaussian kernel, nor by any of the other radial basis function kernels commonly used in the literature. A consequence for this kind of kernels is also the non-existence of Mercer expansions on $\mathbb{R}^2$, with respect to any finite measure, whose eigenfunctions all belong to a closed ball of $\mathcal{L}_\infty$.
Kernel Expansions with Unlabeled Examples
Modern classification applications necessitate supplementing the few available labeled examples with unlabeled examples to improve classi(cid:173) fication performance. We present a new tractable algorithm for exploit(cid:173) ing unlabeled examples in discriminative classification. This is achieved essentially by expanding the input vectors into longer feature vectors via both labeled and unlabeled examples. The resulting classification method can be interpreted as a discriminative kernel density estimate and is read(cid:173) ily trained via the EM algorithm, which in this case is both discriminative and achieves the optimal solution. We provide, in addition, a purely dis(cid:173) criminative formulation of the estimation problem by appealing to the maximum entropy framework.
Kernel Methods for Implicit Surface Modeling
We describe methods for computing an implicit model of a hypersurface that is given only by a finite sampling. The methods work by mapping the sample points into a reproducing kernel Hilbert space and then deter- mining regions in terms of hyperplanes. Suppose we are given a finite sampling (in machine learning terms, training data) x1, . . . The case d 3 is especially interesting since these days there are many devices, e.g., laser range scanners, that allow the acquisition of point data from the boundary surfaces of solids. For further processing it is often necessary to transform this data into a continu- ous model. Today the most popular approach is to add connectivity information to the data by transforming them into a triangle mesh (see [4] for an example of such a transformation algorithm).
A unifying representer theorem for inverse problems and machine learning
The standard approach for dealing with the ill-posedness of the training problem in machine learning and/or the reconstruction of a signal from a limited number of measurements is regularization. The method is applicable whenever the problem is formulated as an optimization task. The standard strategy consists in augmenting the original cost functional by an energy that penalizes solutions with undesirable behavior. The effect of regularization is very well understood when the penalty involves a Hilbertian norm. Another popular configuration is the use of an $\ell_1$-norm (or some variant thereof) that favors sparse solutions. In this paper, we propose a higher-level formulation of regularization within the context of Banach spaces. We present a general representer theorem that characterizes the solutions of a remarkably broad class of optimization problems. We then use our theorem to retrieve a number of known results in the literature---e.g., the celebrated representer theorem of machine leaning for RKHS, Tikhonov regularization, representer theorems for sparsity promoting functionals, the recovery of spikes---as well as a few new ones.
Learning Neuron Non-Linearities with Kernel-Based Deep Neural Networks
Marra, Giuseppe, Zanca, Dario, Betti, Alessandro, Gori, Marco
The effectiveness of deep neural architectures has been widely supported in terms of both experimental and foundational principles. There is also clear evidence that the activation function (e.g. the rectifier and the LSTM units) plays a crucial role in the complexity of learning. Based on this remark, this paper discusses an optimal selection of the neuron non-linearity in a functional framework that is inspired from classic regularization arguments. It is shown that the best activation function is represented by a kernel expansion in the training set, that can be effectively approximated over an opportune set of points modeling 1-D clusters. The idea can be naturally extended to recurrent networks, where the expressiveness of kernel-based activation functions turns out to be a crucial ingredient to capture long-term dependencies. We give experimental evidence of this property by a set of challenging experiments, where we compare the results with neural architectures based on state of the art LSTM cells.
McKernel: A Library for Approximate Kernel Expansions in Log-linear Time
Curtó, Joachim D., Zarza, Irene C., Yang, Feng, Smola, Alexander J., De La Torre, Fernando, Ngo, Chong-Wah, Van Gool, Luc
Kernel Methods Next Generation (KMNG) introduces a framework to use kernel approximates in the mini-batch setting with SGD Optimizer as an alternative to Deep Learning. McKernel is a C++ library for KMNG ML Large-scale. It contains a CPU optimized implementation of the Fastfood algorithm that allows the computation of approximated kernel expansions in log-linear time. The algorithm requires to compute the product of Walsh Hadamard Transform (WHT) matrices. A cache friendly SIMD Fast Walsh Hadamard Transform (FWHT) that achieves compelling speed and outperforms current state-of-the-art methods has been developed. McKernel allows to obtain non-linear classification combining Fastfood and a linear classifier.
Large-Scale Sparsified Manifold Regularization
Tsang, Ivor W., Kwok, James T.
Semi-supervised learning is more powerful than supervised learning by using both labeled and unlabeled data. In particular, the manifold regularization framework, together with kernel methods, leads to the Laplacian SVM (LapSVM) that has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance. However, the LapSVM solution typically involves kernel expansions of all the labeled and unlabeled examples, and is slow on testing. Moreover, existing semi-supervised learning methods, including the LapSVM, can only handle a small number of unlabeled examples. In this paper, we integrate manifold regularization with the core vector machine, which has been used for large-scale supervised and unsupervised learning. By using a sparsified manifold regularizer and formulating as a center-constrained minimum enclosing ball problem, the proposed method produces sparse solutions with low time and space complexities. Experimental results show that it is much faster than the LapSVM, and can handle a million unlabeled examples on a standard PC; while the LapSVM can only handle several thousand patterns.
Large-Scale Sparsified Manifold Regularization
Tsang, Ivor W., Kwok, James T.
Semi-supervised learning is more powerful than supervised learning by using both labeled and unlabeled data. In particular, the manifold regularization framework, together with kernel methods, leads to the Laplacian SVM (LapSVM) that has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance. However, the LapSVM solution typically involves kernel expansions of all the labeled and unlabeled examples, and is slow on testing. Moreover, existing semi-supervised learning methods, including the LapSVM, can only handle a small number of unlabeled examples. In this paper, we integrate manifold regularization with the core vector machine, which has been used for large-scale supervised and unsupervised learning. By using a sparsified manifold regularizer and formulating as a center-constrained minimum enclosing ball problem, the proposed method produces sparse solutions with low time and space complexities. Experimental results show that it is much faster than the LapSVM, and can handle a million unlabeled examples on a standard PC; while the LapSVM can only handle several thousand patterns.